On 06/04/2016 01:40 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty writes:
>
>> On 06/03/2016 11:33 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Ah, that reminds me. What's the doneness of the dependent topic?
>> [...]
>
> What I meant was the doneness of mh/split-under-lock actually.
I don't know of
Michael Haggerty writes:
> On 06/03/2016 11:33 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Michael Haggerty writes:
>>
>>> This patch series applies on top of mh/split-under-lock. It can also
>>> be obtained from my GitHub repo [2] as branch "ref-iterators".
>>
>> Ah, that reminds me. What's the doneness of
On 06/03/2016 11:33 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty writes:
>
>> This patch series applies on top of mh/split-under-lock. It can also
>> be obtained from my GitHub repo [2] as branch "ref-iterators".
>
> Ah, that reminds me. What's the doneness of the dependent topic?
If you mean
Michael Haggerty writes:
> This patch series applies on top of mh/split-under-lock. It can also
> be obtained from my GitHub repo [2] as branch "ref-iterators".
Ah, that reminds me. What's the doneness of the dependent topic?
The patches in this series looked all good to me.
> Michael
>
> [1
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 14:33 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> This is v2 of a patch series to implement iteration over references
> via iterators. Thanks to Ramsay, Eric, Junio, and David for their
> feedback about v1 [1]. I think I have addressed all of the points
> that
> were raised.
In case I d
This is v2 of a patch series to implement iteration over references
via iterators. Thanks to Ramsay, Eric, Junio, and David for their
feedback about v1 [1]. I think I have addressed all of the points that
were raised.
Changes from v1 -> v2:
* In "refs: introduce an iterator interface":
* Fix s
6 matches
Mail list logo
