Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support triangular workflows

2013-03-23 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Philip Oakley" writes: > >> Shouldn't Documentation/gitworkflows.txt also be updated with the >> triangular workflow and its configuration? > > What is missing from gitworkflows documentation is actually a > non-triangular workflow, where people pull from and push into the

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support triangular workflows

2013-03-22 Thread Junio C Hamano
"Philip Oakley" writes: > Shouldn't Documentation/gitworkflows.txt also be updated with the > triangular workflow and its configuration? What is missing from gitworkflows documentation is actually a non-triangular workflow, where people pull from and push into the same central repository. The "

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support triangular workflows

2013-03-22 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Tay Ray Chuan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra > wrote: >> remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefault >> remote.c: introduce branch..pushremote > > Perhaps we should clarify how this differs from remote.pushurl in the > documentation for it, in git-config and/or git-p

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support triangular workflows

2013-03-22 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Philip Oakley wrote: > From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:44 PM > >> This follows-up [1], with three important differences: >> >> 1. pushremote_get() and remote_get() share code better. Thanks Jeff. >> >> 2. All spelling mistakes have been corrected. Thanks Eric. >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support triangular workflows

2013-03-20 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:44 PM This follows-up [1], with three important differences: 1. pushremote_get() and remote_get() share code better. Thanks Jeff. 2. All spelling mistakes have been corrected. Thanks Eric. 3. One new test for each of the new co

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Support triangular workflows

2013-03-20 Thread Tay Ray Chuan
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefault > remote.c: introduce branch..pushremote Perhaps we should clarify how this differs from remote.pushurl in the documentation for it, in git-config and/or git-push. Maybe even include the desi

[PATCH v2 0/6] Support triangular workflows

2013-03-20 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
This follows-up [1], with three important differences: 1. pushremote_get() and remote_get() share code better. Thanks Jeff. 2. All spelling mistakes have been corrected. Thanks Eric. 3. One new test for each of the new configuration variables. The extra two parts [2/6] and [3/6] preprare the