On 2019.07.29 22:29, Martin Ågren wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 01:56, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> > This series revives an old suggestion [...] to make merge honor
> > pre-commit hook or a separate pre-merge hook. Since pre-commit does not
> > receive any arguments (which the hook could use tell bet
On 2019.07.29 22:09, Martin Ågren wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 01:56, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> > * Martin's objection on 1/4 that the sample hook would always exit
> > successfully is (I believe) incorrect. To test this, I ran
> > "/bin/true && exec test 0 == 1" in a /bin/sh subshell, and it
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 01:56, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> This series revives an old suggestion [...] to make merge honor
> pre-commit hook or a separate pre-merge hook. Since pre-commit does not
> receive any arguments (which the hook could use tell between commit and
> merge) and in order to keep exi
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 01:56, Josh Steadmon wrote:
> * Martin's objection on 1/4 that the sample hook would always exit
> successfully is (I believe) incorrect. To test this, I ran
> "/bin/true && exec test 0 == 1" in a /bin/sh subshell, and it
> correctly had a non-zero exit status.
I retr
(I'm resending this cover letter with fixed Message-Id so that threading
@ public-inbox works properly. Sorry for the noise.)
I would like to revive discussion on this series; I have addressed most
of the review comments on the original series sent by Michael, with the
following exceptions:
* Mar
I would like to revive discussion on this series; I have addressed most
of the review comments on the original series sent by Michael, with the
following exceptions:
* Martin's objection on 1/4 that the sample hook would always exit
successfully is (I believe) incorrect. To test this, I ran
"/
6 matches
Mail list logo
