Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
>> I do not think the above is a good change in the first place for at
>> least two reasons. By saying , the updated text says "not just
>> branches but you can also give tags and remote-tracking branches".
>
> I used as you could actually use tags, remote-tracking bran
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 09:10 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
>
> > If is the correct substitute , I could try to send a
> > patch that fixes this.
>
> I do not think the above is a good change in the first place for at
> least two reasons. By saying , the updated text sa
Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
> Something like the following diff with additional changes to other
> places that refer to ,
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
> index 67d48e688..ba4a545bf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-re
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 11:25 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
>
> > 1. "git rebase " does nothing
>
> Not limited to "rebase", you do not muck with remote-tracking branch
> in your local repository, so it would be a bug if the above updated
> where the remote-tracking bran
Kaartic Sivaraam writes:
> 1. "git rebase " does nothing
Not limited to "rebase", you do not muck with remote-tracking branch
in your local repository, so it would be a bug if the above updated
where the remote-tracking branch points at.
The form of "git rebase" with one extra argument (i.e. n
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Perhaps time to learn "git symbolic-ref HEAD" and use it instead of
> depending on the name?
Good point. Helped remove the assumption that there's no branch named HEAD.
(and indirectly led to 2 additional patches and the 3 questions found below ;-)
This started as a sma
6 matches
Mail list logo
