On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Thomas Rast wrote:
> This is a fixed version of the initial patch, plus a two-patch
> implementation of a recursion-free unpack_entry. (I narrowly resisted
> using "unrecursify" to describe it.)
Hmmm... the intention is sensible and the patches look sane, however I
don't ha
This is a fixed version of the initial patch, plus a two-patch
implementation of a recursion-free unpack_entry. (I narrowly resisted
using "unrecursify" to describe it.)
I wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> The stack/recursion is used _only_ for error recovery, no? If we do
>> not care about
2 matches
Mail list logo