Johannes Löthberg writes:
>>But if we made some change to the transfer to push-to-receive-pack
>>so that this can also create HEAD that points at something, what
>>would the user say, instead of that earlier
>>
>> $ git clone git://site.xz/r
>>
>>to access this new namespace? Don't you have to b
On 20/06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano writes:
Let me step back and try again, as I think I am missing some
existing feature you are using, and that missing piece is preventing
me from seeing why this is a good idea (by the way, I do not think
we are doing this exchange in the right thre
Junio C Hamano writes:
>> You create a namespace by pushing to it,...
>
> You keep repeating that, but I do not think we agreed that it is the
> supported or correct procedure to set up a new namespace in the
> first place. Doesn't the server side need a lot more than just
> setting up HEAD symr
On 20/06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Löthberg writes:
On 15/06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
You would probably want new tests, but more importantly did you make
sure this passes existing tests? It seems to break 5509 (there
could be others) at least for me.
It breaks 5509 currently yeah, th
Johannes Löthberg writes:
> On 15/06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>You would probably want new tests, but more importantly did you make
>>sure this passes existing tests? It seems to break 5509 (there
>>could be others) at least for me.
>>
>
> It breaks 5509 currently yeah, though I've already fixed
On 15/06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
You would probably want new tests, but more importantly did you make
sure this passes existing tests? It seems to break 5509 (there
could be others) at least for me.
It breaks 5509 currently yeah, though I've already fixed it locally.
Anyway,
You create a nam
Johannes Löthberg writes:
> On 13/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
>>Git should fail to clone if trying to clone from an non-existing
>>ref namespace, since it's the same as a non-existing repository
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Johannes Löthberg
>>---
>>
>>Changes since v1:
>>
>>* Fixed the namespace check,
On 13/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
Git should fail to clone if trying to clone from an non-existing
ref namespace, since it's the same as a non-existing repository
Signed-off-by: Johannes Löthberg
---
Changes since v1:
* Fixed the namespace check, since I apparently forgot to check with a
ba
Git should fail to clone if trying to clone from an non-existing
ref namespace, since it's the same as a non-existing repository
Signed-off-by: Johannes Löthberg
---
Changes since v1:
* Fixed the namespace check, since I apparently forgot to check with a
bare repo in my last test. D'oh.
Two
9 matches
Mail list logo
