On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 06:53:50PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> >> The patch looks good to me.
> >
> > Thanks, all.
>
> Oops, spoke a bit too fast. As the previous one is already in
> 'next', let's do this instead.
That's fine with me. Sorry about the delay getting
Junio C Hamano writes:
>> The patch looks good to me.
>
> Thanks, all.
Oops, spoke a bit too fast. As the previous one is already in
'next', let's do this instead.
-- >8 --
From: "brian m. carlson"
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 23:59:37 +
Subject: [PATCH] fetch-pack: clear alternate shallow in on
Duy Nguyen writes:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:00 AM brian m. carlson
> wrote:
>>
>> When we write an alternate shallow file in update_shallow, we write it
>> into the lock file. The string stored in alternate_shallow_file is
>> copied from the lock file path, but it is freed the moment that the
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:00 AM brian m. carlson
wrote:
>
> When we write an alternate shallow file in update_shallow, we write it
> into the lock file. The string stored in alternate_shallow_file is
> copied from the lock file path, but it is freed the moment that the lock
> file is closed, since
When we write an alternate shallow file in update_shallow, we write it
into the lock file. The string stored in alternate_shallow_file is
copied from the lock file path, but it is freed the moment that the lock
file is closed, since we call strbuf_release to free that path.
This used to work, sinc
5 matches
Mail list logo
