Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Wong writes:
> > + argv_array_push(&unpack.args, "unpack-objects");
> > + argv_array_push(&unpack.args, "-q");
> > +
> > + return run_command(&unpack);
> Looks good. I haven't thought if "-q" is appropriate or not though.
Oops, I think tying it to the existi
Eric Wong writes:
> +static int loosen_small_pack(const struct packed_git *p)
> +{
> + struct child_process unpack = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> +
> + if (lseek(p->pack_fd, 0, SEEK_SET) < 0)
> + die_errno("Failed seeking to start of '%s'", p->pack_name);
> +
> + unpack.in = p->p
Jeff King wrote:
> There we have fetch.unpackLimit and receive.unpackLimit for the two
> operations, plus transfer.unpackLimit to control both of them. This
> doesn't necessarily need to be tied to that config, but you could
> certainly consider it in the same boat. It's a way of transferring a
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
