Dave Williams writes:
> On 15:27, Thu 05 Sep 13, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Now the long option name is "--no-index", it makes me wonder if "-i"
>> is a good synonym for it, and the longer I stare at it, the more
>> certain I become convinced that it is a bad choice.
>>
> I had originally called i
On 15:27, Thu 05 Sep 13, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Now the long option name is "--no-index", it makes me wonder if "-i"
> is a good synonym for it, and the longer I stare at it, the more
> certain I become convinced that it is a bad choice.
>
I had originally called it "--ignore-index" at which poin
Dave Williams writes:
> check-ignore currently shows how .gitignore rules would treat untracked
> paths. Tracked paths do not generate useful output. This prevents
> debugging of why a path became tracked unexpectedly unless that path is
> first removed from the index with `git rm --cached `.
>
check-ignore currently shows how .gitignore rules would treat untracked
paths. Tracked paths do not generate useful output. This prevents
debugging of why a path became tracked unexpectedly unless that path is
first removed from the index with `git rm --cached `.
This option (-i, --no-index) simp
4 matches
Mail list logo
