On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
> I can't quite parse the first sentence in this paragraph. Perhaps something
> like this:
>
> To detect when a child has finished executing, we check interleaved
> with other actions (such as checking the liveliness of children or
> startin
Am 14.12.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Stefan Beller:
This allows to run external commands in parallel with ordered output
on stderr.
If we run external commands in parallel we cannot pipe the output directly
to the our stdout/err as it would mix up. So each process's output will
flow through a pipe, wh
This allows to run external commands in parallel with ordered output
on stderr.
If we run external commands in parallel we cannot pipe the output directly
to the our stdout/err as it would mix up. So each process's output will
flow through a pipe, which we buffer. One subprocess can be directly
pi
Junio C Hamano writes:
> I may have comments on other parts of this patch, but I noticed this
> a bit hard to read while reading the end result.
> ...
I finished reading the remainder. Other than the above all look
sensible.
Will replace what had been queued.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from th
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> + while (1) {
>> + int i;
>> + int output_timeout = 100;
>> + int spawn_cap = 4;
>> +
>> + if (!no_more_task) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < spawn_ca
Stefan Beller writes:
> + while (1) {
> + int i;
> + int output_timeout = 100;
> + int spawn_cap = 4;
> +
> + if (!no_more_task) {
> + for (i = 0; i < spawn_cap; i++) {
> + int code;
> +
This allows to run external commands in parallel with ordered output
on stderr.
If we run external commands in parallel we cannot pipe the output directly
to the our stdout/err as it would mix up. So each process's output will
flow through a pipe, which we buffer. One subprocess can be directly
pi
7 matches
Mail list logo
