Re: [PATCH 5/7] receive-pack: move execute_commands_non_atomic before execute_commands

2014-12-23 Thread Stefan Beller
I tried all four diff options as listed in the man page of format-diff. I forget which one I used, but there was no large difference w.r.t. reviewability if I remember correctly. On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> Notes: >> This patch is new

Re: [PATCH 5/7] receive-pack: move execute_commands_non_atomic before execute_commands

2014-12-22 Thread Junio C Hamano
Stefan Beller writes: > Notes: > This patch is new with v6 of the series > > As execute_commands_non_atomic is larger than execute_commands, the diff > is not moving around execute_commands_non_atomic, but execute_commands. ;-) Next time perhaps try "--patience" to decide betwe

[PATCH 5/7] receive-pack: move execute_commands_non_atomic before execute_commands

2014-12-19 Thread Stefan Beller
This way we don't need to declare the function first and implement it later, but rather we put the implementation directly at the place where the function was declared. The reason I did not move it up in the first place is better readability of the diff as the execute_commands_non_atomic function