On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 7:46 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 05:51:43AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> I'm not necessarily advocating this, but think it's worth mentioning
>> that an alternate solution would be to fix test_when_finished() to work
>> correctly in subshells rather t
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 05:51:43AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> > test_when_finished does nothing in a subshell because the change to
> > test_cleanup does not affect the parent.
> >
> > There is no POSIX way to detect that we are in a subshel
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> test_when_finished does nothing in a subshell because the change to
> test_cleanup does not affect the parent.
>
> There is no POSIX way to detect that we are in a subshell ($$ and $PPID
> are specified to remain unchanged), but we can detect i
test_when_finished does nothing in a subshell because the change to
test_cleanup does not affect the parent.
There is no POSIX way to detect that we are in a subshell ($$ and $PPID
are specified to remain unchanged), but we can detect it on Bash and
fall back to ignoring the bug on other shells.
4 matches
Mail list logo
