Re: [PATCH 3/6] submodule status: correct path handling in recursive submodules

2016-03-29 Thread Junio C Hamano
Stefan Beller writes: > The new test which is a replica of the previous test except > that it executes from a sub directory. Prior to this patch > the test failed by having too many '../' prefixed: > > --- expect 2016-03-29 19:02:33.087336115 + > +++ actual 2016-03-29 19:02:33.359343311

[PATCH 3/6] submodule status: correct path handling in recursive submodules

2016-03-29 Thread Stefan Beller
The new test which is a replica of the previous test except that it executes from a sub directory. Prior to this patch the test failed by having too many '../' prefixed: --- expect2016-03-29 19:02:33.087336115 + +++ actual2016-03-29 19:02:33.359343311 + @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ b2

[PATCH 3/6] submodule status: correct path handling in recursive submodules

2016-03-29 Thread Stefan Beller
The new test which is a replica of the previous test except that it executes from a sub directory. Prior to this patch the test failed by having too many '../' prefixed: --- expect2016-03-29 19:02:33.087336115 + +++ actual2016-03-29 19:02:33.359343311 + @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ b2