Michael Haggerty writes:
> ... All of the following seem to make sense:
>
> git rebase --edit COMMIT
>
> A long-form for the -e option we have been talking about.
> It is unfortunately that this spelling sounds like the
> "--edit" option on "git commit --edit" and "gi
On 03/04/2014 11:24 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>> git rebase --fixup COMMIT
>> git rebase --squash COMMIT
>
> This is not interactive (except when merge conflicts occur), is it?
--fixup would not be interactive (is that a problem?), bu
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>>> Is it correct to single out only "edit" for special treatment? If
>>> allowing "edit" on the command-line, then shouldn't command-line
>>> "reword" also be supported? I, for one
On 03/04/2014 03:08 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>> wrote:
>>> "git rebase -e XYZ" is basically the same as
>>>
>>> EDITOR="sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@" \
>>> git rebase -i XYZ^
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> wrote:
>> "git rebase -e XYZ" is basically the same as
>>
>> EDITOR="sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@" \
>> git rebase -i XYZ^
>>
>> In English, it prepares the todo list for you to edi
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> "git rebase -e XYZ" is basically the same as
>
> EDITOR="sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@" \
> git rebase -i XYZ^
>
> In English, it prepares the todo list for you to edit only commit XYZ
> to save your time. The time saving is only si
Duy Nguyen writes:
> Logically, yes. Practically, no. If you have to put multiple -e and
> some hashes in one line, wouldn't editing to-do list in your favorite
> editor be faster?
An editor is the last resort when the card puncher is broken.
--
David Kastrup
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 03/02/2014 10:09 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>>> wrote:
"git rebase -e XYZ" is basically the same as
EDIT
On 03/02/2014 10:09 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>> wrote:
>>> "git rebase -e XYZ" is basically the same as
>>>
>>> EDITOR="sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@" \
>>> git rebase -i XYZ^
>>>
>
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> wrote:
>> "git rebase -e XYZ" is basically the same as
>>
>> EDITOR="sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@" \
>> git rebase -i XYZ^
>>
>> In English, it prepares the todo list for you to edi
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> "git rebase -e XYZ" is basically the same as
>
> EDITOR="sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@" \
> git rebase -i XYZ^
>
> In English, it prepares the todo list for you to edit only commit XYZ
> to save your time. The time saving is only si
"git rebase -e XYZ" is basically the same as
EDITOR="sed -i '1s/pick XYZ/edit XYZ/' $@" \
git rebase -i XYZ^
In English, it prepares the todo list for you to edit only commit XYZ
to save your time. The time saving is only significant when you edit a
lot of commits separately.
Signed-off-by: Nguy
12 matches
Mail list logo
