>
> That is only because the last example the "See ... for details"
> refers to is about 'git push', isn't it?
>
This is correct but there was no direct link to git-fetch in the first example
and I did not check which combination of man pages gives the complete
definition of refspecs ...
---
Thomas Ackermann writes:
>
>>
>> I think we can just drop "See ... for details" from here. Besides,
>> why just "push" and not "fetch"?
>>
>
> I just kept the original reference which only linked to git-push.
That is only because the last example the "See ... for details"
refers to is about
>
> I think we can just drop "See ... for details" from here. Besides,
> why just "push" and not "fetch"?
>
I just kept the original reference which only linked to git-push.
---
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vg
Thomas Ackermann writes:
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann
> ---
> Documentation/glossary-content.txt | 65
> ++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt
> b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt
>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann
---
Documentation/glossary-content.txt | 65 ++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt
b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt
index 05bfebc..1c9c522 100644
--- a/Document
5 matches
Mail list logo