David Turner writes:
>> * Pick 'next', 'jch' and 'pu' as the starting point, attempted to
>
> Do you mean that you merged these branches together, or that you tried
> each of the three?
I tried at least these three (and some other intermediate states)
before giving up.
--
To unsubscribe from thi
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 13:54 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Up to high-teens in this 43 patch series, the changes all looked
> "separate filesystem backend specific part from refs.c to
> refs-be-files.c" without other questionable changes, but I have to
> give up at this step for now, as conflicts b
Up to high-teens in this 43 patch series, the changes all looked
"separate filesystem backend specific part from refs.c to
refs-be-files.c" without other questionable changes, but I have to
give up at this step for now, as conflicts between the patch and the
current codebase is getting a bit too mu
From: Ronnie Sahlberg
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
Signed-off-by: David Turner
---
refs-be-files.c | 36 +---
refs.c | 47 +++
refs.h | 23 +++
3 files changed, 95 insertions(+),
4 matches
Mail list logo
