David Turner writes:
> Make test-dump-cache-tree more useful for testing. Do not treat known
> invalid trees as errors (and do not produce non-zero exit code),
> because we can fall back to the non-cache-tree codepath.
Under-explained. "more useful" is subjective so I won't complain
about it b
Make test-dump-cache-tree more useful for testing. Do not treat known
invalid trees as errors (and do not produce non-zero exit code),
because we can fall back to the non-cache-tree codepath.
Signed-off-by: David Turner
---
t/t0090-cache-tree.sh | 28 +---
test-dump-cac
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:13 PM, David Turner wrote:
> Make test-dump-cache-tree more useful for testing. Do not treat known
> invalid trees as errors (and do not produce non-zero exit code),
> because we can fall back to the non-cache-tree codepath.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Turner
> ---
> t/t0
Make test-dump-cache-tree more useful for testing. Do not treat known
invalid trees as errors (and do not produce non-zero exit code),
because we can fall back to the non-cache-tree codepath.
Signed-off-by: David Turner
---
t/t0090-cache-tree.sh | 28 +---
test-dump-cac
Make test-dump-cache-tree more useful for testing. Do not treat known
invalid trees as errors (and do not produce non-zero exit code),
because we can fall back to the non-cache-tree codepath.
Signed-off-by: David Turner
---
t/t0090-cache-tree.sh | 28 +---
test-dump-cac
5 matches
Mail list logo