On 10.11.2015 13:56, Richard Ipsum wrote:
+Existing tools such as Github's pull-requests and Gerrit are already
+in wide use, why bother with something new?
+
+We are concerned that whilst git is a distributed version control
+system the systems used to store comments and reviews for content
+un
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 09:48 +, Richard Ipsum wrote:
> >
> > > + (master)$ git candidate submit origin archiverepo
> > > + Review added successfully
> >
> > Is the contributor automatically (optionally) emailed on this? If not,
> > consider this a feature request for this.
>
> There's no serv
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:19:11PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
> I didn't actually read the code. Instead, I started with the README and
> decided to provide both text and UX comments all mixed up. These are
> mostly my personal preferences; take them or leave them as you choose.
>
> I'm really
I didn't actually read the code. Instead, I started with the README and
decided to provide both text and UX comments all mixed up. These are
mostly my personal preferences; take them or leave them as you choose.
I'm really excited about this tool and I think it's got great potential!
On Tue, 2
Describes motivation for git-candidate and shows an example workflow.
Signed-off-by: Richard Ipsum
---
contrib/git-candidate/README.md | 154
1 file changed, 154 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 contrib/git-candidate/README.md
diff --git a/contrib/git-c
Describes motivation for git-candidate and shows an example workflow.
Signed-off-by: Richard Ipsum
---
contrib/git-candidate/README.md | 153
1 file changed, 153 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 contrib/git-candidate/README.md
diff --git a/contrib/git-c
6 matches
Mail list logo
