Peter Krefting writes:
> Torsten Bögershausen:
>
>> The function git_wcwidth() returns for a given unicode code point the
>> width on the display:
>> -1 for control characters,
>> 0 for combining or other non-visible code points
>> 1 for e.g. ASCII
>> 2 for double-width code points.
>
> This all
Torsten Bögershausen writes:
> The function git_wcwidth() returns for a given unicode code point the
> width on the display:
> -1 for control characters,
> 0 for combining or other non-visible code points
> 1 for e.g. ASCII
> 2 for double-width code points.
>
> This table had been originally b
Torsten Bögershausen:
The function git_wcwidth() returns for a given unicode code point the
width on the display:
-1 for control characters,
0 for combining or other non-visible code points
1 for e.g. ASCII
2 for double-width code points.
This all looks sane, but the problem is that this is al
The function git_wcwidth() returns for a given unicode code point the
width on the display:
-1 for control characters,
0 for combining or other non-visible code points
1 for e.g. ASCII
2 for double-width code points.
This table had been originally been extracted for one Unicode version,
probabl
4 matches
Mail list logo