On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:15:49AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Why do we need an initialiser at this point (in other words, how
> have other existing slab users coped without having one)?
>
> I think they call init_*_slab() when the slab is needed/used the
> first time (e.g. it is not even wor
Jeff King writes:
> Callers currently must use init_foo_slab() at runtime before
> accessing a slab. For global slabs, it's much nicer if we
> can initialize them in BSS, so that each user does not have
> to add code to check-and-initialize.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King
> ---
> There was no comm
Callers currently must use init_foo_slab() at runtime before
accessing a slab. For global slabs, it's much nicer if we
can initialize them in BSS, so that each user does not have
to add code to check-and-initialize.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King
---
There was no comment on this one in v1. I'd be curio
3 matches
Mail list logo
