On 08/03, Thomas Rast wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer writes:
>
> > Since the cache-tree data is saved as part of the directory data,
> > we have already read it, when we want to read the cache-tree. The
> > cache-tree then only has to be converted from the directory data.
>
> I think the first sentenc
Thomas Gummerer writes:
> Since the cache-tree data is saved as part of the directory data,
> we have already read it, when we want to read the cache-tree. The
> cache-tree then only has to be converted from the directory data.
I think the first sentence is wrong. You have already read it at th
Since the cache-tree data is saved as part of the directory data,
we have already read it, when we want to read the cache-tree. The
cache-tree then only has to be converted from the directory data.
The cache-tree isn't lexically sorted, but after the pathlen at
each level, therefore the directorie
3 matches
Mail list logo
