Felipe Contreras writes:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>> That is the kind of thing that needs to be said, not in the
>> discussion but in the history, either in the log or in a new test,
>> or both.
>
> If only I had known that when I wrote the commit message.
T
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>>>
We don't want to pass arguments specific to fast-export to
setup_revisions.
>>>
>>> Interesting. What bad thing
Felipe Contreras writes:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>>
>>> We don't want to pass arguments specific to fast-export to
>>> setup_revisions.
>>
>> Interesting. What bad things happen with the current order?
>>
>> Does "fast-export --export
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> We don't want to pass arguments specific to fast-export to
>> setup_revisions.
>
> Interesting. What bad things happen with the current order?
>
> Does "fast-export --export-marks=foo" causes setup_revisions()
Felipe Contreras writes:
> We don't want to pass arguments specific to fast-export to
> setup_revisions.
Interesting. What bad things happen with the current order?
Does "fast-export --export-marks=foo" causes setup_revisions() to
mistakenly eat --export-marks=foo and barf?
>
> Signed-off-by:
We don't want to pass arguments specific to fast-export to
setup_revisions.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras
---
builtin/fast-export.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/fast-export.c b/builtin/fast-export.c
index d60d675..6e46057 100644
--- a/builtin/fa
6 matches
Mail list logo