On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Martin von Zweigbergk writes:
>
> s/it seems the prefix doesn't change/the prefix never changes/;
:-) Thanks for confirming.
> In that sense it probably does not even matter if you did not pass
> rev->prefix down to check_rev, and instead
Martin von Zweigbergk writes:
> get_patch_ids() takes an already initialized rev_info and a
> prefix. The prefix is used when initalizing a second rev_info. Since
> the initialized rev_info already has a prefix and it seems the prefix
> doesn't change, we can used the prefix from the initialized
get_patch_ids() takes an already initialized rev_info and a
prefix. The prefix is used when initalizing a second rev_info. Since
the initialized rev_info already has a prefix and it seems the prefix
doesn't change, we can used the prefix from the initialized rev_info
to initialize the second rev_in
3 matches
Mail list logo
