Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> > I hope v2 addresses your concerns.
>>
>> Unfortunately I am still confused.
>>
>> The way the overlong line is folded in the new version of the patch
>> makes it easier to read, but I didn't find a reason why checking the
>> number of fetch_refspec does not go a
Hi Junio,
[re-Cc:ing the list]
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>
> >> So, it is an error if we have "remote" and if
> >>
> >> (1) URL for the remote is defined alrea
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> > When adding a remote, we make sure that the remote does not exist
> > already.
> >
> > For convenience, we allow re-adding remotes with the same URLs.
> > This also handles the case that there is an "[url .
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> When adding a remote, we make sure that the remote does not exist
> already.
>
> For convenience, we allow re-adding remotes with the same URLs.
> This also handles the case that there is an "[url ...] insteadOf"
> setting in the config.
>
> It might seem like a mist
When adding a remote, we make sure that the remote does not exist
already.
For convenience, we allow re-adding remotes with the same URLs.
This also handles the case that there is an "[url ...] insteadOf"
setting in the config.
It might seem like a mistake to compare against remote->url[0] withou
5 matches
Mail list logo