Jeff King writes:
> Yeah, every struct on a platform where FLEX_ARRAY is 1 ends up
> over-allocated by 1 byte. We could account for that in all of our flex
> allocations, but I don't it affects enough platforms to be worth the
> bother.
It was an explicit design decision to declare that the
over
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 05:56:48AM -0700, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
wrote:
> Probably in the endeavor to avoid the `calloc()` implied by
> `FLEX_ALLOC_STR()` (it is hard to know why exactly, the commit message
> of that commit is a bit parsimonious with information), it calls
> `malloc
From: Johannes Schindelin
In f9e6c649589e (untracked cache: load from UNTR index extension,
2015-03-08), code was added to read back the untracked cache from an
index extension.
Probably in the endeavor to avoid the `calloc()` implied by
`FLEX_ALLOC_STR()` (it is hard to know why exactly, the co
3 matches
Mail list logo