"brian m. carlson" writes:
> On 2019-08-20 at 21:12:00, René Scharfe wrote:
>> So perhaps this on top? (Or squash it in, if you like, but it's
>> certainly not worth a re-roll.)
>
> Yeah, this seems sensible. I'll include it if I do a re-roll.
Thanks.
On 2019-08-20 at 21:12:00, René Scharfe wrote:
> So perhaps this on top? (Or squash it in, if you like, but it's
> certainly not worth a re-roll.)
Yeah, this seems sensible. I'll include it if I do a re-roll.
--
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
signature
Am 18.08.19 um 22:04 schrieb brian m. carlson:
> diff --git a/builtin/patch-id.c b/builtin/patch-id.c
> index bd28b80b2d..3059e525b8 100644
> --- a/builtin/patch-id.c
> +++ b/builtin/patch-id.c
> @@ -1,15 +1,16 @@
> +#include "cache.h"
> #include "builtin.h"
> #include "config.h"
> #include "dif
Convert the two separate patch-id implementations to use the_hash_algo
in their implementation.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson
---
builtin/patch-id.c | 11 ++-
diff.c | 46 +++---
diff.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 30 inserti
4 matches
Mail list logo