On 30/05/2019 13:04, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
>> I had a brief look at the series. IMO, it is a mistake to appease
>> -Wmissing-field-initializer.
>>
>> We have two sorts of initializers:
>>
>> - zero initializers: they just want to nu
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> I had a brief look at the series. IMO, it is a mistake to appease
> -Wmissing-field-initializer.
>
> We have two sorts of initializers:
>
> - zero initializers: they just want to null out every field,
>like CHILD_PROCESS_INIT
Hi Ramsay,
I had a brief look at the series. IMO, it is a mistake to appease
-Wmissing-field-initializer.
We have two sorts of initializers:
- zero initializers: they just want to null out every field,
like CHILD_PROCESS_INIT and ad-hoc initializers of structs
such as xpparam_t pp = { 0 }
On 24/05/2019 23:30, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 24 2019, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>> [No, I won't be sending 52 patches to the list!]
>> [...]
>> This series does not fix any problems or add any new features, so it
>> is not important (hence the tendency to 'slip'). I don't wa
On Fri, May 24 2019, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> [No, I won't be sending 52 patches to the list!]
> [...]
> This series does not fix any problems or add any new features, so it
> is not important (hence the tendency to 'slip'). I don't want to
> flood the mailing list with patches that nobody wants, s
[No, I won't be sending 52 patches to the list!]
This series, started last year, has been hanging around because the
time never seemed right to send it to the list. It may still not be
the right time ... :-D
I would like to be able to compile git using '-Wall -Wextra -Werror'
compiler options.
6 matches
Mail list logo