On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>
> I think this risk is acceptable nevertheless, because expiring reflogs
> is an uncommon operation and unlikely to be done from two processes at
> the same time; moreover, the integrity of reflogs is not a matter of
> life or death.
> ...
On 04/07/2016 03:02 PM, David Turner wrote:
> We now have quite a large number of patches before we even get into
> the meat of the pluggable refs backend series. So it's worth breaking
> those out and getting them in before we get into the main series
> (which Michael Haggerty swants to redesign
David Turner writes:
> We now have quite a large number of patches before we even get into
> the meat of the pluggable refs backend series. So it's worth breaking
> those out and getting them in before we get into the main series
> (which Michael Haggerty swants to redesign a bit anyway).
>
> Th
We now have quite a large number of patches before we even get into
the meat of the pluggable refs backend series. So it's worth breaking
those out and getting them in before we get into the main series
(which Michael Haggerty swants to redesign a bit anyway).
This set of patches should be applie
4 matches
Mail list logo
