Re: [PATCH 00/16] git bisect improvements

2016-03-22 Thread Pranit Bauva
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Stephan Beyer wrote: >> If it is okay with you then can I work more upon these >> patches in my GSoC project. > > I'm totally fine with that, of course. :) Thanks! :) I will try and fix the left over bug if time persists. Regards, Pranit Bauva -- To unsubscribe f

Re: [PATCH 00/16] git bisect improvements

2016-03-22 Thread Christian Couder
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Stephan Beyer wrote: > > Also sorry, I am not following the list so I didn't know there was a > GSoC project for bisect. > >> If it is okay with you then can I work more upon these >> patches in my GSoC project. > > I'm totally fine with that, of course. :) You a

Re: [PATCH 00/16] git bisect improvements

2016-03-21 Thread Stephan Beyer
Hi Pranit, On 03/20/2016 07:50 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote: > I have been recently following this series of patches and it seems a > bit stale. These patches haven't been followed up with improvement > patches. I'm on vacation at the moment. Patchset v1 contains some bugs. So I just updated the branc

Re: [PATCH 00/16] git bisect improvements

2016-03-20 Thread Pranit Bauva
I have been recently following this series of patches and it seems a bit stale. These patches haven't been followed up with improvement patches. If it is okay with you then can I work more upon these patches in my GSoC project. These really seem interesting and Git could really benefit from this.

[PATCH 00/16] git bisect improvements

2016-02-25 Thread Stephan Beyer
Hi, this set of patches provides improvements for git bisect. Quick summary of changes - relevant for users: - `git bisect next` is documented and motivated - git bisect implementation becomes much faster (or: is now working) for big repositories** - relevant for developers: - a t