Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 'simple' is supposed to be an easy and safe default to help new
> people. Your original patch to change its semantics for the central
> workflow from the current 'make sure upstream is set and set to the
> same name' to 'anything goes' is making the mode more dangerous than
Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
> I hope (perhaps foolishly) to persuade you nevertheless. I fear that
> if this series solidifies before I get there, we'll be stuck with this
> stupid erroring-out behavior forever.
I do not think it is "stupid" at all.
'simple' is supposed to be an easy and safe
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> [PATCH 3/6] push: change `simple` to accommodate triangular workflows
>
> Sqaushed in the fix to keep the semantics of "simple" when used in
> the centralized workflow the same as before.
Yeah, I'm worried about this as I pointed out earlier. I don't like
erroring ou
This is mostly Ram's triangular-push-fix series, but the fix-up
commits I queued on top of it when the series was queued to 'pu'
have been squashed in.
[PATCH 1/6] t/t5528-push-default: remove redundant test_config lines
No changes, as posted by Ram.
[PATCH 2/6] config doc: rewrite push.de
4 matches
Mail list logo
