On Wed, Jul 31 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 01:20:55AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> > Michael Haggerty and I have (off-list) discussed variations on that, but
>> > it opens up a lot of new issues. Moving something into quarantine isn't
>> > atomic. So you've st
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 01:20:55AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > Michael Haggerty and I have (off-list) discussed variations on that, but
> > it opens up a lot of new issues. Moving something into quarantine isn't
> > atomic. So you've still corrupted the repo, but now it's recoverabl
On Tue, May 07 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:44:06AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> Maybe there's some case I haven't thought of that makes this stupid, but
>> I wonder if something like a "gc quarantine" might be a fix fo both of
>> the the issues you noted abo
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 11:44:06AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> Maybe there's some case I haven't thought of that makes this stupid, but
> I wonder if something like a "gc quarantine" might be a fix fo both of
> the the issues you noted above.
>
> I.e. it seems to me that the main issu
On Tue, Mar 19 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:45:39PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> > I don't think the quarantine stuff should impact contention at all. It's
>> > only quarantining the objects, which are the least contentious part of
>> > Git (because object co
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:45:39PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > I don't think the quarantine stuff should impact contention at all. It's
> > only quarantining the objects, which are the least contentious part of
> > Git (because object content is idempotent, so we don't do any locking
On Mon, Mar 18 2019, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 05:14:58PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> This series is unrelated (and does not conflict with) my in-flight gc
>> contention series
>> (https://public-inbox.org/git/20190315155959.12390-1-ava...@gmail.com/),
>> but the
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 05:14:58PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> This series is unrelated (and does not conflict with) my in-flight gc
> contention series
> (https://public-inbox.org/git/20190315155959.12390-1-ava...@gmail.com/),
> but the "git-gc" docs should be updated to discuss the
>
I've been annoyed by the "gc" docs for a while. This fixes most of the
issues I've noticed, and also removes the duplication between the "gc"
variables in git-config(1) and in git-gc(1), which was made possible
by Duy's Documentation/config/* series.
This should make the "gc" docs more awesome, an
9 matches
Mail list logo
