Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add --no-ahead-behind to status

2017-12-20 Thread Jeff King
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 02:42:41PM +, Jeff Hostetler wrote: > From: Jeff Hostetler > > This patch series adds a "--no-ahead-behind" option to status > to request that it avoid a possibly expensive ahead/behind > computation for the current branch. Instead, it just prints a > not up to date

[PATCH 0/4] Add --no-ahead-behind to status

2017-12-20 Thread Jeff Hostetler
From: Jeff Hostetler This patch series adds a "--no-ahead-behind" option to status to request that it avoid a possibly expensive ahead/behind computation for the current branch. Instead, it just prints a not up to date message in place of the detailed counts. This idea was previously discussed