> It is amazing to me how much my perspective changed when I actually had to
> teach Git to new users. Things that I live with easily all of a sudden
> become these unnecessarily confusing road blocks that make it *so hard* to
> actually use Git.
I see. Without the -y patch, this series looks good
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:08 PM Johannes Sixt wrote:
> >
> > Am 10.12.18 um 20:04 schrieb Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget:
> > > The idea was brought up by Paul Morelle.
> > >
> > > To be honest, this idea of rescheduling a failed exec
Hi Elijah,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 3:13 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
> wrote:
> >
> > The idea was brought up by Paul Morelle.
> >
> > To be honest, this idea of rescheduling a failed exec makes so much sense
> > that I wish we had done this
Stefan Beller writes:
> I wonder if it might be better to push this mechanism
> one layer down: Instead of having a flag that changes
> the behavior of the "exec" instructions and having a
> handy '-y' short cut for the new mode, we'd rather have
> a new type of command that executes&retries a co
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 3:13 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
wrote:
>
> The idea was brought up by Paul Morelle.
>
> To be honest, this idea of rescheduling a failed exec makes so much sense
> that I wish we had done this from the get-go.
>
> So let's do the next best thing: implement a co
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:18 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
wrote:
> The idea was brought up by Paul Morelle.
>
> To be honest, this idea of rescheduling a failed exec makes so much sense
> that I wish we had done this from the get-go.
>
> So let's do the next best thing: implement a co
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:08 PM Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
> Am 10.12.18 um 20:04 schrieb Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget:
> > The idea was brought up by Paul Morelle.
> >
> > To be honest, this idea of rescheduling a failed exec makes so much sense
> > that I wish we had done this from the get-g
Am 10.12.18 um 20:04 schrieb Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget:
The idea was brought up by Paul Morelle.
To be honest, this idea of rescheduling a failed exec makes so much sense
that I wish we had done this from the get-go.
The status quo was actually not that bad a decision, because it ma
The idea was brought up by Paul Morelle.
To be honest, this idea of rescheduling a failed exec makes so much sense
that I wish we had done this from the get-go.
So let's do the next best thing: implement a command-line option and a
config setting to make it so.
The obvious intent behind that con
9 matches
Mail list logo
