Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
>>> Handles the nongit case in strbuf_check_branch_ref instead of
>>> introducing a new check_branch_ref_format helper.
>>
>> I view that as a regression, actually. Don't we want a function
>> that does not require a s
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>> Handles the nongit case in strbuf_check_branch_ref instead of
>> introducing a new check_branch_ref_format helper.
>
> I view that as a regression, actually. Don't we want a function
> that does not require a strbuf when asking a simple question
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Handles the nongit case in strbuf_check_branch_ref instead of
> introducing a new check_branch_ref_format helper.
I view that as a regression, actually. Don't we want a function
that does not require a strbuf when asking a simple question: "I
have a string, and I want
Hi,
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] check-ref-format: --branch cannot grok @{-1} outside a
> repository
How about this? It is written to be more conservative than the patch
I am replying to, but except for the commit message, it should be
pretty much equivalent.
[...]
> --- a/builtin
4 matches
Mail list logo
