On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 15:42 -0800, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> I'll queue these for now, but I doubt the wisdom of this series,
> >> given that the ship has already sailed long ti
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> If we instead introduced "no-thin", it is more like:
>
> 1. Receive-pack starts advertising "no-thin" (as dictated by
> circumstances, as Carlos describes).
>
> 2. Send-pack which does not understand no-thin will ignore it and send
>
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I'll queue these for now, but I doubt the wisdom of this series,
>> given that the ship has already sailed long time ago.
>>
>> Currently, no third-party implementation of a rec
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:25:50PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Support in the code isn't always enough. The particular case that
> > brought this on is one where the index-pack implementation can deal with
> > thin packs just fine.
> >
> > This particular service takes the pack which the clie
Carlos Martín Nieto writes:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I'll queue these for now, but I doubt the wisdom of this series,
>> given that the ship has already sailed long time ago.
>>
>> Currently, no third-party implementation of a receiving end can
>> accept thin
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 12:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I'll queue these for now, but I doubt the wisdom of this series,
> given that the ship has already sailed long time ago.
>
> Currently, no third-party implementation of a receiving end can
> accept thin push, because "thin push" is not a c
Carlos Martín Nieto writes:
> Hi all,
>
> This comes as a result of the discussion starting at [0] about
> git-push assuming that a server will always support thin packs. Most
> out there in fact do, but this isn't necessarily the case.
>
> Some implementations may not have support for it yet, or
Hi all,
This comes as a result of the discussion starting at [0] about
git-push assuming that a server will always support thin packs. Most
out there in fact do, but this isn't necessarily the case.
Some implementations may not have support for it yet, or the server
might be running in an environ
8 matches
Mail list logo
