Re: [PATCH 0/2] split index extra bits

2017-05-07 Thread Christian Couder
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Christian Couder writes: >> >>> This patch series contains 2 patches that have already been sent to >>> the list but have felt through the cracks. It would be nice if they >>> could be considered for v2.13.0. >>

Re: [PATCH 0/2] split index extra bits

2017-05-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Christian Couder writes: > >> This patch series contains 2 patches that have already been sent to >> the list but have felt through the cracks. It would be nice if they >> could be considered for v2.13.0. > > There is no way for anything new to go to 2.13 without getting

Re: [PATCH 0/2] split index extra bits

2017-05-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Christian Couder writes: > This patch series contains 2 patches that have already been sent to > the list but have felt through the cracks. It would be nice if they > could be considered for v2.13.0. There is no way for anything new to go to 2.13 without getting reviewed and discussed at this po

[PATCH 0/2] split index extra bits

2017-05-05 Thread Christian Couder
This patch series contains 2 patches that have already been sent to the list but have felt through the cracks. It would be nice if they could be considered for v2.13.0. Patch 1/2 (split-index: add and use unshare_split_index()) by Duy fixes a memory leak when a new shared index file is created and