Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix clone guess_dir_name regression in v2.4.8

2015-08-05 Thread Jeff King
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:19:56AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I think this regression is in v2.4.8, as well. We should be able to use > >> a running "len" instead of the "end" pointer in the earlier part, and > >> then use strip_suffix_mem later (to strip from our already-reduced > >> lengt

Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix clone guess_dir_name regression in v2.4.8

2015-08-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jeff King writes: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:42:46PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > >> > I did not intend this change in behavior, and I can confirm that >> > reverting my patch restores the original behavior. Thanks for bringing >> > this to my attention, I'll work on a patch. >> >> I think this r

[PATCH 0/2] fix clone guess_dir_name regression in v2.4.8

2015-08-05 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:42:46PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > I did not intend this change in behavior, and I can confirm that > > reverting my patch restores the original behavior. Thanks for bringing > > this to my attention, I'll work on a patch. > > I think this regression is in v2.4.8, as w