On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > You really _mustn't_ try to create the pack directly to the
> > > $GIT_DIR/objects/pack subdirectory - that would make git itself start
>
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> >
> > You really _mustn't_ try to create the pack directly to the
> > $GIT_DIR/objects/pack subdirectory - that would make git itself start
> > possibly using that pack before the index is all done, and
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps git-pack-objects should have the base as a optional argument,
> > with a default of the filename in $GIT_DIR/objects/pack and an option
> > for sending just the pack file to stdout?
>
> You r
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
>
> Perhaps git-pack-objects should have the base as a optional argument,
> with a default of the filename in $GIT_DIR/objects/pack and an option
> for sending just the pack file to stdout?
You really _mustn't_ try to create the pack directly to the
$
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, regardless, we want to be able to specify which directory to write
> > > them to. We don't necessarily want to write them to the curr
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Well, regardless, we want to be able to specify which directory to write
> > them to. We don't necessarily want to write them to the current working
> > directory, nor do we want to write them to
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > So I would suggest either:
> >
> > - droping the packname parameter from git-pack-objects. Make
> > the packs always named pack-X{40}.pack (or just X{40}.pack);
>
> Well, regardless, we want to
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> So I would suggest either:
>
> - droping the packname parameter from git-pack-objects. Make
> the packs always named pack-X{40}.pack (or just X{40}.pack);
Well, regardless, we want to be able to specify which directory to write
them to. We
Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This series has one patch which is ready to go in and one that's not
> (although it's a reasonable phony for the current state of the git world).
I like the general direction in which this patch is leading us.
But before going further, I'd like to se
This series has one patch which is ready to go in and one that's not
(although it's a reasonable phony for the current state of the git world).
1: Several additional functions are needed in the library to support
progressively getting pack data from some remote location and using it
to de
10 matches
Mail list logo
