Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>> It looks to me that this is a reduced duplicate of what brian posted
>> yesterday. The first two patches in the 6-patch series that you
>> commented on, I think, covers what this change wants to achieve and
>> probably a lot more. I've me
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>> The svn specific declaration of repo_init was not used since 723b7a2789
>> (vcs-svn: eliminate repo_tree structure, 2010-12-10).
>>
>> This was noticed when including repository.h via cache.h as that has the
>> same function with a different signat
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>> The svn specific declaration of repo_init was not used since 723b7a2789
>> (vcs-svn: eliminate repo_tree structure, 2010-12-10).
>>
>> This was noticed when including repository.h via cache.h as that has the
>> same function with a different signat
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>
>> The svn specific declaration of repo_init was not used since 723b7a2789
>> (vcs-svn: eliminate repo_tree structure, 2010-12-10).
>>
>> This was noticed when including repository.h via cache.h as that has the
>>
Stefan Beller writes:
> The svn specific declaration of repo_init was not used since 723b7a2789
> (vcs-svn: eliminate repo_tree structure, 2010-12-10).
>
> This was noticed when including repository.h via cache.h as that has the
> same function with a different signature.
>
> Helped-by: Jonathan
The svn specific declaration of repo_init was not used since 723b7a2789
(vcs-svn: eliminate repo_tree structure, 2010-12-10).
This was noticed when including repository.h via cache.h as that has the
same function with a different signature.
Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller
6 matches
Mail list logo