Re: [PATCH] use gcrypt instead of libssl for hash

Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Well, libgcrypt seems to be pretty rare out there - I certainly don't have > it installed on my machine. Well, I don't even have openssl ... > Or merge the SHA1 code from the kernel, even, and make the project > entirely self-sufficient. ... so I took the sha1 code fro

Re: [PATCH] use gcrypt instead of libssl for hash

Hi, Thanks for your comments. > > This is the first time for me to send you a patch; be gentle. > > the following patch allows for use of gcrypt. > > Well, libgcrypt seems to be pretty rare out there - I certainly don't have > it installed on my machine. Hmm... okay. Might be the case if you

Re: [PATCH] use gcrypt instead of libssl for hash

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > This is the first time for me to send you a patch; be gentle. > the following patch allows for use of gcrypt. Well, libgcrypt seems to be pretty rare out there - I certainly don't have it installed on my machine. > libssl seems to have a restric

[PATCH] use gcrypt instead of libssl for hash

Hi, This is the first time for me to send you a patch; be gentle. the following patch allows for use of gcrypt. libssl seems to have a restrictive licensing wrt GPL applications. This patch adds a requirement for libgcrypt11, and removes the requirement for libssl. I hope I have not overlook