On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:26:29PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> Test the new "ambiguous" result from cat-file --batch and
> --batch-check. This is in t1512 instead of t1006 since
> we need a repo with ambiguous object_id names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong
> ---
> t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.
ambiguous data already at hand was easiest.
>
> -----8<---
> Subject: [PATCH] t1512: test ambiguous cat-file --batch and --batch-
> output
>
> Test the new "ambiguous" result from cat-file --batch and
> --batch-check. This is in t1512 instead of t1006 sinc
David Turner wrote:
> Let's try this version.
Thanks!
Tested-by: Eric Wong
Not sure if t1512 would be the best place to put the test, but
having a repo with ambiguous data already at hand was easiest.
-8<---
Subject: [PATCH] t1512: test ambiguous cat-file --batch
3 matches
Mail list logo