Re: [PATCH] systemd socket activation support

2015-04-08 Thread Erik Faye-Lund
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Shawn Landden wrote: > From: Shawn Landden > > v1.1: actually test... > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Landden > --- > daemon.c | 35 +++--- > git-daemon.service | 7 +++ > git-daemon.socket | 9 > sd-daemon.c| 132 >

Re: [PATCH] systemd socket activation support

2015-04-02 Thread Shawn Landden
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Eric Sunshine writes: > >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Shawn Landden wrote: >>> From: Shawn Landden >>> >>> [PATCH] systemd socket activation support >> >> This patch feels like an R

Re: [PATCH] systemd socket activation support

2015-04-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Eric Sunshine writes: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Shawn Landden wrote: >> From: Shawn Landden >> >> [PATCH] systemd socket activation support > > This patch feels like an RFC rather than a properly fleshed-out > submission. If so, indicate such in the sub

[PATCH] systemd socket activation support

2015-04-01 Thread Shawn Landden
From: Shawn Landden v1.1: actually test... Signed-off-by: Shawn Landden --- daemon.c | 35 +++--- git-daemon.service | 7 +++ git-daemon.socket | 9 sd-daemon.c| 132 + sd-daemon.h| 91 +++

Re: [PATCH] systemd socket activation support

2015-04-01 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Shawn Landden wrote: > From: Shawn Landden > > [PATCH] systemd socket activation support This patch feels like an RFC rather than a properly fleshed-out submission. If so, indicate such in the subject. Also, mention the area you're touching, follo

[PATCH] systemd socket activation support

2015-04-01 Thread Shawn Landden
From: Shawn Landden Signed-off-by: Shawn Landden --- daemon.c | 38 --- git-daemon.service | 6 +++ git-daemon.socket | 9 sd-daemon.c| 132 + sd-daemon.h| 91 ++