Re: [PATCH] submodule status: properly pass options with --recursive

2012-10-26 Thread Jens Lehmann
Am 26.10.2012 21:07, schrieb Phil Hord: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jeff King wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:20:29AM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote: >> >>> When renaming orig_args to orig_flags in 98dbe63d (submodule: only >>> preserve flags across recursive status/update invocations) the

Re: [PATCH] submodule status: properly pass options with --recursive

2012-10-26 Thread Phil Hord
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:20:29AM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote: > >> When renaming orig_args to orig_flags in 98dbe63d (submodule: only >> preserve flags across recursive status/update invocations) the call site >> of the recursive cmd_status was f

Re: [PATCH] submodule status: properly pass options with --recursive

2012-10-26 Thread Jeff King
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:20:29AM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote: > When renaming orig_args to orig_flags in 98dbe63d (submodule: only > preserve flags across recursive status/update invocations) the call site > of the recursive cmd_status was forgotten. At that place orig_args is > still passed into

[PATCH] submodule status: properly pass options with --recursive

2012-10-25 Thread Jens Lehmann
When renaming orig_args to orig_flags in 98dbe63d (submodule: only preserve flags across recursive status/update invocations) the call site of the recursive cmd_status was forgotten. At that place orig_args is still passed into the recursion, which is always empty now. This clears all options when