On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:49:15PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Though this is a stack overflow, I don't know that it's exploitable for
> > anything interesting; an attacker does not get to write arbitrary data,
> > but rather only a sequence of "^%d" and "~%d" relative history markers.
> > P
Jeff King wrote:
> When we generate relative names (e.g., "master~20^2"), we
> format the name into a static buffer, then xstrdup the
> result to attach it to the commit. Since the first thing we
> add into the static buffer is the already-computed name of
> the child commit, the names may get lon
When we generate relative names (e.g., "master~20^2"), we
format the name into a static buffer, then xstrdup the
result to attach it to the commit. Since the first thing we
add into the static buffer is the already-computed name of
the child commit, the names may get longer and longer as
the traver
3 matches
Mail list logo
