Re: [PATCH] sha1_name: use strlcpy() to copy strings

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:33:16PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 21:00 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > >René Scharfe writes: > > > >>Use strlcpy() instead of calling strncpy() and then setting the last > >>byte of the target buffer to NUL explicitly. This shortens and > >>simplifies th

Re: [PATCH] sha1_name: use strlcpy() to copy strings

Am 22.02.2015 um 21:00 schrieb Junio C Hamano: René Scharfe writes: Use strlcpy() instead of calling strncpy() and then setting the last byte of the target buffer to NUL explicitly. This shortens and simplifies the code a bit. Thanks. It makes me wonder if the longer term direction should

Re: [PATCH] sha1_name: use strlcpy() to copy strings

René Scharfe writes: > Use strlcpy() instead of calling strncpy() and then setting the last > byte of the target buffer to NUL explicitly. This shortens and > simplifies the code a bit. Thanks. It makes me wonder if the longer term direction should be not to use a bound buffer for oc->path, th

[PATCH] sha1_name: use strlcpy() to copy strings

Use strlcpy() instead of calling strncpy() and then setting the last byte of the target buffer to NUL explicitly. This shortens and simplifies the code a bit. Signed-of-by: Rene Scharfe --- sha1_name.c | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/sha1_name.c b/sha