Re: [PATCH] send-email: do not insert third header

2014-06-10 Thread Stepan Kasal
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:38:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > two new options [..] > would support the recent kernel submission convention better. indeed, but they are not there and I do not volunteer to write them. Instead, I edit the generated patches to add the necessary headers. But if se

Re: [PATCH] send-email: do not insert third header

2014-06-09 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Stepan Kasal writes: > >> It is sometimes desirable to insert several header lines at the top of >> the body, e.g., if From or Date differs from the mail header. >> (Linus even recommends to use this second header for all kernel >> submissions.) >> >> send-email has a mi

Re: [PATCH] send-email: do not insert third header

2014-06-09 Thread Junio C Hamano
Stepan Kasal writes: > It is sometimes desirable to insert several header lines at the top of > the body, e.g., if From or Date differs from the mail header. > (Linus even recommends to use this second header for all kernel > submissions.) > > send-email has a minimal support for this; make sure

[PATCH] send-email: do not insert third header

2014-06-07 Thread Stepan Kasal
It is sometimes desirable to insert several header lines at the top of the body, e.g., if From or Date differs from the mail header. (Linus even recommends to use this second header for all kernel submissions.) send-email has a minimal support for this; make sure it is not applied when there is a