On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:28:48PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> By the way, a totally unrelated niggle I have with 2073949 is this.
>
> $ git describe --contains 2073949
> v2.3.1~3^2~4
>
> while as you said, this dates back to at least v2.2.0-rc0
>
> $ git tag --contains 2073949
>
Jeff King writes:
> When we unwrap a tag to find its commit for a traversal, we
> do not propagate the "name" field of the tag in the pending
> array (i.e., the ref name the user gave us in the first
> place) to the commit (instead, we use an empty string). This
> means that "git log --source" wi
When we unwrap a tag to find its commit for a traversal, we
do not propagate the "name" field of the tag in the pending
array (i.e., the ref name the user gave us in the first
place) to the commit (instead, we use an empty string). This
means that "git log --source" will never show the tag-name
for
3 matches
Mail list logo
