Re: [PATCH] replace: forbid replacing an object with one of a different type

2013-08-08 Thread Junio C Hamano
"Philip Oakley" writes: > From: "Christian Couder" > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:42 AM >> Users replacing an object with one of a different type were not >> prevented to do so, even if it was obvious, and stated in the doc, >> that bad things would result from doing that. >> >> To avoid m

Re: [PATCH] replace: forbid replacing an object with one of a different type

2013-08-08 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Christian Couder" Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:42 AM Users replacing an object with one of a different type were not prevented to do so, even if it was obvious, and stated in the doc, that bad things would result from doing that. To avoid mistakes, it is better to just forbid that

Re: [PATCH] replace: forbid replacing an object with one of a different type

2013-08-07 Thread Thomas Rast
Christian Couder writes: > Users replacing an object with one of a different type were not > prevented to do so, even if it was obvious, and stated in the doc, > that bad things would result from doing that. > > To avoid mistakes, it is better to just forbid that though. > > The doc will be updat

[PATCH] replace: forbid replacing an object with one of a different type

2013-08-06 Thread Christian Couder
Users replacing an object with one of a different type were not prevented to do so, even if it was obvious, and stated in the doc, that bad things would result from doing that. To avoid mistakes, it is better to just forbid that though. The doc will be updated in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Ch