Re: [PATCH] remote: drop free_refspecs() function

Jeff King wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] remote: drop free_refspecs() function > > We already have free_refspec(), a public function which does > the same thing as the static free_refspecs(). Let's just > keep one. There are two minor differences between the > functions: > &

[PATCH] remote: drop free_refspecs() function

patch gone his second patch is not tangled up with this >topic, so I think it should go on its own branch. Makes sense on both counts. Here's that stand-alone patch for reference, which can go onto its own topic. -- >8 -- Subject: [PATCH] remote: drop free_refspecs() function