Re: [PATCH] refs: document transaction semantics

2016-02-25 Thread David Turner
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 12:34 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > David Turner writes: > > > I thought it would be better in the api docs, since it's a design > > decision that all backends should follow. > > Makes sense; as this describes an already available API, it > shouldn't have to wait for the r

Re: [PATCH] refs: document transaction semantics

2016-02-25 Thread Junio C Hamano
David Turner writes: > I thought it would be better in the api docs, since it's a design > decision that all backends should follow. Makes sense; as this describes an already available API, it shouldn't have to wait for the remainder of your series and can just go to 'master' (or even to 'maint'

Re: [PATCH] refs: document transaction semantics

2016-02-25 Thread David Turner
I thought it would be better in the api docs, since it's a design decision that all backends should follow. On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 15:05 -0500, David Turner wrote: > Add some comments on ref transaction semantics to refs.h > > Signed-off-by: David Turner > --- > refs.h | 12 > 1 fil

[PATCH] refs: document transaction semantics

2016-02-25 Thread David Turner
Add some comments on ref transaction semantics to refs.h Signed-off-by: David Turner --- refs.h | 12 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/refs.h b/refs.h index c0964f5..9b3eaf3 100644 --- a/refs.h +++ b/refs.h @@ -112,6 +112,11 @@ extern int dwim_log(const char *str, int